By Geoff Mulvihill and David A. Lib
Missouri’s Jefferson City (AP) The reforms to Medicaid, food assistance, and other programs, according to proponents of the comprehensive tax and spending plan that Congress submitted to President Donald Trump, will promote individual accountability and put an end to systemic fraud.
The stipulations of the measure, which received final legislative approval Thursday, are criticized for upending people’s lives.
Check out what individuals have to say about the bill.
Many people between the ages of 19 and 64 would have to work, attend school, or complete at least 80 hours of community service per month in order to be eligible for and remain on Medicaid.
People in 40 states who are enrolled under expanded access, which states have agreed to implement since 2014, will be subject to the Medicaid work requirement. Florida and Texas were among the ten states that chose not to expand the program.
Many would be required to work until they turn 65 in order to receive the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which currently requires adults between the ages of 18 and 55 to work.
There would be exclusions from both benefits, such as for parents who look after children younger than 14.
The majority of Medicaid beneficiaries currently fulfill the work requirement or are eligible for an exemption.
Theresa Gibbs is a Medicaid and SNAP enrollee who lost her job as a school bus driver. Given that she has three children under the age of 14, she probably would not be subject to the work mandate. Gibbs, however, stated that she is still seeking for jobs.
Gibbs, 34, of Jefferson City, Missouri, stated, “I don’t think people should just live off the state if they’re perfectly capable to work.”
Others, however, are concerned about the changes.
St. Martins, Missouri resident Amanda Hinton, 39, is a Medicaid and SNAP recipient. She works a part-time job at a gas station and puts in enough hours to probably fulfill the new criteria, but she is worried that her fibromyalgia, which causes pain and fatigue, would prevent her from working for a while.
I’m in a panic. She explained, “I rely on my medication to help me just get through the day because I have some chronic health conditions that are not curable.” And I couldn’t buy these without Medicaid.
Brittany Phillips, 32, of Greensboro, North Carolina, said that although working a temporary, remote medical services job that pays roughly $600 per week, being on Medicaid has helped her remain afloat both financially and health-wise.
According to her, “I do think that Medicaid should be available for everyone regardless of who they are regardless of capacity,” she stated.
According to the impartial Congressional Budget Office, the reforms, which also include expelling non-citizens who are not lawfully and permanently in the United States, could result in 11.8 million fewer individuals having health insurance by 2034. Those who might lose coverage for other reasons are not included in it.
Even those who are protected by exemptions to the work requirement may lose their Medicaid coverage, according to advocates. The need that eligibility be evaluated at least every six months is a primary factor.
Deborah Steinberg, a senior health policy analyst at the Legal Action Center, stated that you lose people with each extra document that they must submit apart from their application.
Julia Bennker, a Medicaid and SNAP recipient who operates an in-home daycare in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, has experienced administrative problems due to current Medicaid regulations. She claimed that earlier this year, despite believing she filed her paperwork on time, she was informed that they were late, and as a result, she was without health coverage for a month.
This required rescheduling another visit with a prescriber and skipping therapy for a month.
Medicaid computer systems do not currently account for mental illness and substance use disorders, two circumstances that would result in exclusions.
Chief advocacy officer for the National Alliance on Mental Illness Hannah Wesolowski stated, “It’s not like you wave a magic wand and everyone who should be exempt is exempt.”
In addition to dealing with federal funding decreases, state health care and social services agencies will need to update their computer systems to accommodate the numerous changes. Some health care advocates are concerned about that.
The law mandates that all states pay a larger share of SNAP’s administrative expenses beginning in 2027. It also may, for the first time, require certain states to cover a percentage of food assistance benefits beginning in 2028.
Related Articles
-
Here s what to know about clean energy in Republican megabill headed to Trump
-
Takeaways as Congress sends tax and spending cuts bill to Trump s desk
-
Maura Healey: Trump administration won t release $108 million meant for Mass. schools
-
EPA puts on leave 139 employees who spoke out against policies under Trump
-
What s in Trump s big bill that passed Congress and will soon become law
By 2027, states must also enforce the Medicaid work requirement.
According to Sophia Tripoli, senior health policy director at Families USA, a health care advocacy group, many of these states would have an extremely tight and challenging timeframe. The administrative burden of setting up these systems is very high for states.
According to Julieanne Taylor, an attorney at the Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy in North Carolina, clients of her group already experience delays in food program verifications.
“It’s going to be disastrous to add more to them,” she remarked. Because they’re thinking, “I don’t want to have to do this every year or every six months,” people will stop participating.
Experts warn that because the law aims to cap state taxes on hospitals and other healthcare providers in a way that increases Medicaid spending, it may also put rural hospitals at financial danger.
According to KFF, a group that researches health care issues, the plan would reduce Medicaid expenditures in rural areas by $155 billion over the next ten years.
R. Kyle Kramer, CEO of Day Kimball Hospital in Putnam, Connecticut, stated that although many small and rural hospitals are already at risk, it will result in numerous closures.
A $50 billion fund is included in the bill to help offset some of those cuts.
Most abortions are already prohibited from being paid for with federal public funds.
Additionally, the bill would prohibit government monies from being used for cancer screenings and family planning initiatives at Planned Parenthood, the biggest abortion provider in the country.
The group claims that states where abortion is allowed would be the most affected by the legislation, and that one-third of its approximately 600 facilities nationwide may have to close as a result.
According to at least one other group, the clause could result in financial losses for them as well. In order to offer services at different locations around the rural state, Maine Family Planning has 19 sites and subcontracts with other healthcare organizations, such as Planned Parenthood.
From Cherry Hill, New Jersey, Mulvihill reported. Contributions to this report came from Gary D. Robertson in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut.
