In the latest twist in the ongoing investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Senator Rand Paul has intensified his efforts to seek criminal prosecution against Fauci following a bombshell revelation about his presidential pardon.
Pardon Granted by Biden Under Scrutiny
The controversy began when it was revealed that Dr. Fauci had been granted a preemptive pardon by then-President Joe Biden as he left office.
This pardon could shield Fauci from certain legal consequences stemming from his role in the COVID-19 response. However, new details have raised significant questions about the legitimacy of the pardon process.
Former President Biden admitted that the pardon for Dr. Fauci was signed using an autopen, not personally by him, which has led to widespread criticism and suspicion, especially from Republicans.
This revelation sparked further concerns about Biden’s mental state and whether he was fully aware of the pardons being granted in his name. Senator Rand Paul, a longtime critic of Fauci, has now vowed to push for a criminal investigation into Fauci’s actions, particularly related to his testimony before Congress.
Rand Paul’s Renewed Efforts for Prosecution
Paul, who has been vocal in his criticisms of Fauci’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding gain-of-function research and the origins of the virus, took to social media to announce his next steps.
On July 10, Paul posted on X (formerly Twitter), demanding that the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigate Fauci further, especially if the pardon was indeed granted under questionable circumstances.
“If the President didn’t authorize this pardon personally, then the Department has a duty to investigate and prosecute as it would any ordinary citizen,” Paul wrote, emphasizing that Fauci must be held accountable for his alleged lies to Congress and mismanagement during the pandemic.
Alleged Lies and Criminal Referral
Senator Paul has been at the forefront of pushing for criminal charges against Fauci for perjury. In 2023, Fauci testified before Congress and claimed he had “never lied before Congress,” but Paul has pointed to Fauci’s statements during hearings in which he denied funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which Paul believes is a blatant lie.
Paul sent an official criminal referral to the DOJ in response, arguing that Fauci’s testimony directly contradicted evidence suggesting his involvement in such research.
“I sent an official criminal referral to the DOJ because Fauci lied under oath. This is why he must be held accountable,” Paul stated, reiterating his commitment to ensuring Fauci faces legal consequences.
The Autopen Scandal
The use of the autopen to sign such significant legal documents has sparked debate and led to claims of a scandal. Legal experts argue that while it’s technically legal to use the autopen for such actions, the procedural irregularity could undermine the legitimacy of the pardons, especially when signed without direct presidential oversight.
Theo Wold, a legal expert with the Heritage Foundation, testified that the Biden administration used the autopen for multiple clemency warrants, including Fauci’s, during a time when Biden was reportedly available to sign the documents personally.
Critics argue that this lack of personal authorization raises doubts about the true intent behind the pardons and whether they were done in the proper legal manner.
Legal Challenges and Delays
Paul’s efforts to subpoena Dr. Fauci as part of an expanded Senate investigation into the origins of COVID-19 may be met with resistance.
Fauci could challenge the subpoena in court, potentially delaying any further testimony or legal action. Additionally, enforcing a congressional subpoena can be difficult, especially if the DOJ decides not to pursue contempt charges against Fauci for noncompliance.
Despite these potential legal hurdles, Paul remains determined to seek accountability, both for Fauci and for those who allegedly facilitated controversial research funding.
A Divided Reaction
The pardon controversy has sparked a polarizing debate between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans, particularly Paul, argue that this issue represents a grave injustice, with Fauci and others in the government misleading the public and mismanaging the pandemic response.
Democrats, on the other hand, defend the autopen process and argue that Fauci’s actions should be evaluated in the context of his work as a public health official during a time of unprecedented crisis.
Fauci’s Future and Legal Consequences
As Fauci’s legal future unfolds, the potential for criminal charges looms. The focus will likely remain on his testimony, his involvement in gain-of-function research, and his role in the early handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
If convicted, Fauci could face serious legal consequences, including prison time for perjury or other charges related to his actions.
This ongoing saga continues to capture national attention, with political and legal experts weighing in on the ethical and legal implications of the pardon and the potential fallout for Fauci and his legacy.
Source
